New Permission: "Assign Roles"

Kommentare

54 Kommentare

  • Vasp

    Good idea, but something like this can be accomplished with discords bot API.

    -12
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • Undying Soul

    Isn't this already the case?

    -10
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • Jason Hayes

    No, currently when you have permission to manage the roles you can only manage the roles below you and I propose that we can define to a role the permission to manage this or that role but not the roles as a following.

    3
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • Knagie

    Possibly it is Vasp but they wouldn't be able to use the Discord interface to do so. Not everyone is good with chat commands to setup roles. I prefer to use the interface as it is easy to just quickly skim over it to see any permissions that might be off or on which shouldn't be. 

    It would be a good addition to split those permissions.

    4
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • Kiwifruit

    i like that

    4
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • waffles
    Currently not directly via discord so you can get a bot like Dyno that allows mods to assign roles to users using a command
    -3
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • hoodiepaws

    but how to get bots....?

     

    0
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • BLACK SLAYER

    I like this idea, I would love for it to be implemented into Discord.

    5
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • R C N
    Great idea!! hope they will add it.
    4
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • tt2468

    This would be an awesome feature to have natively in the client. +1 for sure.

     

    OP if you are looking for a way to implement a similar feature to this, you can set up a bot that has manage roles and accepts commands from your moderators. For example, you could script it so that `!addrole @user (Role name/id)` adds the role to a user. That would allow you to log what your mods are doing and also allows them to assign roles without manage roles permission.

    9
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • Rika

    Brilliant idea dude.

    4
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • Virulent

    That is one astonishing idea you got there. Not only will mistakes be reduced, but many complications with trollers will be fixed. If this was added it would help out a lot. 

    4
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • jedi3
    maybe somthing similar to this but called differently?
    0
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • nbamadden0

    Greatest idea I have ever heard, would make it so much easier for moderators on a server!

    5
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • gamer6

    Would definitely need this one.

    Permission to give permission specified roles.

    5
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • kiwiSpecial

    This is a really great idea that I had also thought about. It's always seemed that the "Manage Roles" permission was too broad. Splitting up "Assigning" and "Managing" would be great!

    6
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • Jason Hayes
    Exactly
    3
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • monte cristo sandwhich

    This is a must. In addition to being able to create / edit roles. Giving someone the "Manage Role" permissions allows them unlimited ability to change permissions in a channel even for roles above them, unless the "manage permissions" role in that specific channel is set to X, which you have to do for every channel they have access to.

    2
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • ShadowOp

    Agree completely with cristo, I had to assign X to 100 channels on my server because of this.

    2
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • Mir

    (I'm aware that you can bypass this to some degree by creating specific channel roles for each role, but doing it this way creates complications for our muted role, which then can't bypass the specific channel roles that each role would otherwise have. Sorry for not adding this in the original post.)

    0
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • Mir

    (I'm aware that you can bypass this to some degree by creating specific channel roles for each role, but doing it this way creates complications for our muted role, which then can't bypass the specific channel roles that each role would otherwise have. Sorry for not adding this in the original post.)

    0
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • Geebus

    I also wish they would add a toggleable permission to only allow them to edit / add and remove people to certain roles. 

    0
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • Geebus

    I also wish they would add a toggleable permission to only allow them to edit / add and remove people to certain roles. 

    0
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • EchoFox

    Exactly what I came on here to suggest until I saw this post, c'mon Discord! This should have been an obvious permission to have. And I think better wording for it would be "Assign Roles". Cool to see I'm not the only one wanting something like this.

    1
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • EchoFox

    Exactly what I came on here to suggest until I saw this post, c'mon Discord! This should have been an obvious permission to have. And I think better wording for it would be "Assign Roles". Cool to see I'm not the only one wanting something like this.

    1
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • ๓เ๔ภเﻮђՇ

    I wholeheartedly agree to this post, it’s something that I believe would improve Discord.

    0
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • ๓เ๔ภเﻮђՇ

    I wholeheartedly agree to this post, it’s something that I believe would improve Discord.

    0
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • Queen Frost Belladonna

    Sounds pretty neat, yeah.

    0
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • Queen Frost Belladonna

    Sounds pretty neat, yeah.

    0
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
  • rxcScripter

    Agree

    0
    Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink

Bitte melden Sie sich an, um einen Kommentar zu hinterlassen.