Bring back our selfbots!

No planeada

Comentarios

39 comentarios

  • HankyFace

    Hi there, 

    If you own a big community and you can't use a selfbot, then you're screwed. People are contacting me just because I'm the owner... 

    0
    Acciones de comentarios Permalink
  • nedmac.exe

    The only reason i want self-bots back, because i want to be able to show online 24/7

    -1
    Acciones de comentarios Permalink
  • Anime forever🌙

    Agree, but with limits. Can't DM with selfbot, no loud music, no raids, no exploits and etc.

     

    1
    Acciones de comentarios Permalink
  • Dimensional

    As much as I'm not keen on the idea of having a bot connected to a user's account, it can help out a lot in areas where a normal bot account can't function properly. For instance if you restrict user accounts from changing their nicknames, due to them possibly trying to use profanity, a bot is useful to automate that, but what if you were to use a bot to automate it for a game? The biggest problem with automation of changing a nickname is the bot isn't allowed to change the nickname of the server owner at all. Even if it's given admin privileges, it still can't change the nickname of the owner, so they end up being singled out and left to do it manually for themselves when they might want to have it handled by the bot they trust on their server. So if they had a bot they trusted implicitly, even one they built and host on their own PC or personal server, connected directly to their account, then they'd have everything necessary. Even could have it connect with a standard bot account to ensure a higher level of separation and functionality.

    0
    Acciones de comentarios Permalink
  • ༺Ḳ𐍈ŇΛ༻ bobby

    I would love to see self bots be brought back they are very useful in a way that normal bots are not

    3
    Acciones de comentarios Permalink
  • RisingX

    This is never gonna happen

    When a company makes a change and the people vote to reverse that change, that is proper. But doing that without a justification is not proper. For one, people have mentioned the security issues already, if you have a lever that leads to a virus, but you get to eat a cookie, and it is pulled you get a virus for a object that isnt worth much, they didnt pull the lever leaving that cookie. Point is, the use of self-bots is a massive security issue that causes tons of issues with discord, and imagine the uses for people making viruses, you get random links that take your account and dm the rest of your contacts? A cookie is not as worth as much as discord

    Get over your need for self-bots and maybe try finding work arounds or just give up

    -2
    Acciones de comentarios Permalink
  • Wyatt

    Doubt they'll be bringing back selfbots after situations like dis.cool and h0nda.

    I'd also rather not let people have full access to all my private channels and everything.

    Why can't just you use regular bots?
    If there's something they can't do you either find another way around or just deal with it.

    -1
    Acciones de comentarios Permalink
  • lieuwe_berg

    Access to your private channels?

    The idea we're proposing is that we're able to automate the items the Discord client currently offers. The selfbots would see exactly the same as their respective user.

    1
    Acciones de comentarios Permalink
  • IngwiePhoenix

    Hello!

    I would like to chime in here - and I come at this from a *very* different angle. This one: https://matrix.org/docs/projects/bridge/matrix-appservice-discord

     

    I use Matrix as a means to communicate with all my friends on different networks. So far, I have been using this module in order to bridge together a telegram group and a discord server channel. However, I always need to have Discord open if I want to talk just to a few individual people. I don't need voice calling or stuff like that - but what I do need is a way to reduce the amount of programs I have to keep running in order to talk to my friends.

     

    Basically, I am using three main systems: A desktop PC (R9 3900X, 2080 TI, 32GB DDR4), a laptop (MacBook A1342, mid 2010, 16GB DDR3 and a GPU that deserves no mention) and a phone (iPhone XR). I plan on switching most of my workloads to vanilla Linux with GNOME 3 as a desktop environment, and using Riot as a means of communicating with all my networks is very, very handy. But not just that - it also just makes more sense.

     

    Self-bots (aka. puppeted accounts, aka. automated personal accounts, etc...) are one way to make sure that each message sent in Matrix is correctly represented in Discord - and not just in servers, but also in private chats, once selfbots are allowed again. Yes, the Matrix bridge mentioned above _does_ have that feature, but it is against the ToS and thus I do not use it and do not plan to do so. However, I really want to.

     

    On platforms with way more restrictions, writing a custom client (which is obviously not the official client and thus considered a selfbot) would be a much more sufficient solution and even fix a few other issues. One of them is accessibility. Discord is based on Electron, which is based on Chromium, which exports a rather mixed result of accessibility layers that screen readers and other such devices and software can take advantage of. So, using a third-party application would allow someone to develop an application that is more oriented towards this very feature - and boy you dont know how happy my friends would be =). I myself only need screen magnification, so I am fine. But my blind friends? NVDA can only do so much...let alone Orca.

     

    Selfbots can be regulated, there can be restrictions, but as long as it is possible to control an actual user account to tap into private messages and all available servers, there is a lot of potential to be used - or rather, wasted, as long as selfbots stay disabled.

     

    Here is another feature. Secure, private messages. Yes, if you and your pal want to message securely, then just use Matrix or something else instead of Discord. But sometimes, this is not so much an option for a variety of reasons. If two clients send encrypted messages and can thus decrypt them, Discord only gets to log the encrypted bulk, but it is not readable to anyone but the reader and sender - or those holding the keys. This is not something I would suggest, but something that would be made possible with custom clients that are able to take advantage of selfbots: Features that Discord does not provide. At all. And this is just one example - there could be many more things that could be done, but it is the first that came to my mind.

     

    Electron might be an easy way to write application - but it sucks from a performance standpoint. Literally, it sucks away your memory. Look at how much Discord consumes on memory, and then compare it to a native Telegram client for instance. This is not Discord's fault, but something they have to deal with and accomodate for. All they can do is make the best of it...but there could be better, which I think would be possible through selfbots + custom clients. For accessibility, for less-powerful systems and for adding features that may be easily implemented on the client side. There is a reason stuff like BetterDiscord exists, after all.

     

    I know, this went kinda long but I just *had* to chime in here. This is important to me as I am one of those people that want to centralize communication as much as possible, even if it is across multiple networks - something Matrix does. There are possibly more things that could be done than I could come up with and neither of them would deprecate the official client. Because, it **is** the official client. If a 3rdparty one does not work? Well you can always use the official one, after all.

     

    Hopefuly something happens in this regard, seeing as the last message was 17 days ago. I am hoping for the best and wish you a great day. ^.^

    1
    Acciones de comentarios Permalink

Iniciar sesión para dejar un comentario.