Outgoing Webhooks

Commentaires

8 commentaires

  • knockit

    I would also prefer this function/feature.

     

    Slack and Telegram both have these kinds of integrations, and I can run Lambda functions on AWS for free instead of managing a server/container somewhere. 

     

     

    1
    Actions pour les commentaires Permalien
  • ninjacat959

    Dont get

    0
    Actions pour les commentaires Permalien
  • ninjacat959

    Dont get

    0
    Actions pour les commentaires Permalien
  • Keidence

    I would also prefer being able to run bots this way.

    0
    Actions pour les commentaires Permalien
  • _Rok0'sBasilisk_

    This would be a life saver! It is a must feature!

    0
    Actions pour les commentaires Permalien
  • Melissa

    Same, this would be very useful for a number of services, Zapier/IFTTT, etc.

    0
    Actions pour les commentaires Permalien
  • Agthor

    +1 to this for sure! This would help me a ton as I don't expect messages around the clock to trigger my bot. Using something like AWS Lambda I could save cost quite a bit not having an always running process listening to Discord's websocket API.

    To expand on the suggestion, it would be great being able to select which types of events go to a given webhook (similar to selecting one or multiple permissions in an application for OAuth2). This way I could theoretically have one AWS Lambda function handle one or multiple events.

    0
    Actions pour les commentaires Permalien
  • Unsmart [sclip.cc]

    +1 This would make life so much better! Would remove the hassle of trying to ensure connection to all servers. Also would allow me to keep costs down and offer something for my users probably completely free!

    Absolute must have.

    0
    Actions pour les commentaires Permalien

Vous devez vous connecter pour laisser un commentaire.