Sudo suggestion

Seguir
Mr.Mask

I wish we could add a sudo thing for the Api like

This would be an example

msg.sudo('userid','action')

Be aware this is not yet a thing and i would love it that even users and bots could do sudo action

7

Comentários

32 comentários

Data Votos
  • Mr.Mask

    Seriosly i would not like downvotes without a comment

    3
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • username
    That's a -1 from me. Even as an admin-only thing, I see this being easily abused.
    -4
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • PiggyPlex

    I don't see why you would want to do that. That would literally be like giving your token to someone; they could make API requests on your behalf. It would be abused, and it is thus not a good idea

    -4
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Mr.Mask

    It is like for used to test permisions and Trolling

    it would be an owner-only thngi or added on a permision

    4
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Sky_Dragonsz

    If you want to test permissions make a new account and test it with that. 

    What you are suggesting can and WILL be abused. 

     

    Imagining this if this was implemented: 

    Admin account getting hacked in a large community -> sudoing users/bots into sending malicious links or disguising it as a notification from bot because you sudo it. 

     

    -4
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Mr.Mask

    DO you expect everyone to have a spare gmail acc oh wait no they dont

    -1
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Sky_Dragonsz

    10 minute mail, also gmail accounts are free and making one is 1 minute of work. 

    I have a spare gmail account for sites I don't trust or for test purposes. 

     

    "It is like for used to test permisions and Trolling" 

    How are you going to test permissions with a sudo command?

    Ask a friend to join your server and take control over him with sudo? Why not directly asking him what to do and getting live feedback. 

     

    That's why I suggested an extra account for test purposes. 

     

     

    -1
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • ProfessorPixel

    i could see this being implemented but it should have some restrictions like owner only or somthin like that.

    you could use it to send messages as bots or harmless trolls or whatever. there could be a cooldown limit for usage even for the owner

     

    5
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • ıllıllı 𝙳𝙹 𝚉𝚒𝚝𝚔𝚊 ıllıllı

    That's a awesome idea! You could have so much fun trolling people with it! 

    5
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Reさ

    I also think the owner is the only one who may have permissions to do it, and you can already get a bot to say harmful things like make a custom command with it 

    3
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Sky_Dragonsz

    Reさ, if a bot says harmful things its fine, you can just ban the bot, but with the sudo command you will not know if it was the owner that forced someone else to say those things or if it was the user that said that. 

     

    0
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Mr.Mask

    it would be logged onto audit log Sky_dragonz
    i suggest this idea is great and say that noboy should every time downvote it

    0
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Sky_Dragonsz

    If it was something like this I wouldn't mind it as much

    But if it's something like this then this will be a huge problem, the other user doesn't know that you got sudo-ed. audit log is only accessible for admins of the server and you just ruined a friendship with an other person. 

    Also, the voting option is people expressing their opinion about this, you can't just say "Don't downvote this, its a great idea", the voting is here for a reason!

     

    TL;DR: I'm fine with the first picture, but if its something like the second one then I'm absolutely down voting this. 

    3
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Mr.Mask

    upvote it because the 1st one might be the one to be applied

    -1
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • DingleFlop

    This suggestion is just plain bad. There's no realistic use-case for this that doesn't relate to trolling.

    0
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Mr.Mask

    DingleFlop you are bad this is a ALT PROOF way to test the permisions PLUS you have no idea what you are talking about

     

    -2
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Sky_Dragonsz

    Its funny that you suddenly feel attacked because people think this is a bad idea/suggestion. They don't mean you are bad, so why the name calling? 

    Testing permissions can easily be done with an alt account (yes, I know you are lazy to make an alt even with 10 minute mail) or even asking a friend (that you want to force to sudo) to test the permissions. 

     

    I feel like this idea originated from the sudo command you can use on minecraft (with plugins), but on minecraft it is fine to use it. You can't do much harm on minecraft.  

    -2
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Mr.Mask

    you do know that 10minute mail dosent work on discord anymore it asks for phone number

    -1
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • thienbao860
    • Editado

    Have you ever thought about negative cause related to the suggestion you have? People here literally suggest you some harmfulness there, but you just keep trying to deny it. There are millions of people who are using Discord, and any type: good, bad, evil, childlish, etc. And I never think Discord will give a special feature random only to your ordinary guild. Don't just think about yourself; think about the others who got this feature and their complainment in the future

    Also, by you're saying: "Upvote this, don't downvote, etc.." is completely childlish. The voting system is for the expression the user given to the idea, not by the mean you will hunt down one by one you see them "hateful" to you because of the downvote. I hope you understand this. Also, I will not reply back whether you still want to hunt me or not. I'm just giving a downvote for this.

    -1
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Scottieboy1794
    • Editado

    I would vote for a bot to sudo it’ll help with bots that can’t work without a person calling the command. As an example I would like for a bot I use to run a command for another bot with less work load but the other bot requires a person to run the command. I use Charlemagne for destiny 2 clan contributions and with the amount of people I rather one line instead of me doing everyone individually it’ll run the command by sudoing me when I tell it to. Plus make it owner only or admins based and then you don’t have to worry about other people trolling. It’s not that hard to keep others from trolling unless you want them too.

    0
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • sparkzy

    this would be great

     

    1
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Mr.Mask

    There is so much hate

    1
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • xXCyberDarlekXx

    Mr.Mask this in an awful idea. Just because you like the idea and want to troll people does not mean people should agree.

    0
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Bigman Ronald

    I would love to see that ability in a troll bot but realistically no one would make that if it could easily be abused

    2
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • F-00

    imo the sudo command is a great idea and that would be only used by certain roles that way its not abuseble in any way

     

    1
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • TIMOL

    It would be a nice idea. Just a couple ideas of limitation. A Cooldown would be nice, and a view of the audit log, of course, so even if the owner does use the command to abuse, then the admins can Screenshoot the thing and report it for abuse to disscord.

    1
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • mohannad1220

    I think you can see if its sudo through a small detail and it changes every week

    0
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Sky_Dragonsz

    The only way I see this implemented is:

    • if the server has 2FA enabled
    • with a cooldown of at least 30 seconds
    • that the user that is getting sudo-ed gets a notification of what is happening to him (only visible to him)
    • it getting logged in the audit 

    BUT only then I will see this implemented. Otherwise its a huge risk. 

    2
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Scottieboy1794

    It’s not a huge risk if your not an idiot and allow people that you don’t trust have access to it. You guys seems to not run servers.
    - You can set up roles to where non admins can’t do commands.
    - Sudo would only be used by admins/owner unless your dumb enough to give it permission to anyone then that’s a you prob.
    - If you set up rules and roles then you won’t have any issues.

    2
    Ações de comentário Permalink
  • Sky_Dragonsz

    I guess you have never seen a admin going rogue or getting hacked! 

    -1
    Ações de comentário Permalink

Por favor, entrar para comentar.