Sudo suggestion


22 kommentarer

  • Mr.Mask

    Seriosly i would not like downvotes without a comment

  • username
    That's a -1 from me. Even as an admin-only thing, I see this being easily abused.
  • PiggyPlex

    I don't see why you would want to do that. That would literally be like giving your token to someone; they could make API requests on your behalf. It would be abused, and it is thus not a good idea

  • Mr.Mask

    It is like for used to test permisions and Trolling

    it would be an owner-only thngi or added on a permision

  • Sky_Dragonsz

    If you want to test permissions make a new account and test it with that. 

    What you are suggesting can and WILL be abused. 


    Imagining this if this was implemented: 

    Admin account getting hacked in a large community -> sudoing users/bots into sending malicious links or disguising it as a notification from bot because you sudo it. 


  • Mr.Mask

    DO you expect everyone to have a spare gmail acc oh wait no they dont

  • Sky_Dragonsz

    10 minute mail, also gmail accounts are free and making one is 1 minute of work. 

    I have a spare gmail account for sites I don't trust or for test purposes. 


    "It is like for used to test permisions and Trolling

    How are you going to test permissions with a sudo command?

    Ask a friend to join your server and take control over him with sudo? Why not directly asking him what to do and getting live feedback. 


    That's why I suggested an extra account for test purposes. 



  • ProfessorPixel

    i could see this being implemented but it should have some restrictions like owner only or somthin like that.

    you could use it to send messages as bots or harmless trolls or whatever. there could be a cooldown limit for usage even for the owner


  • ıllıllı 𝙳𝙹 𝚉𝚒𝚝𝚔𝚊 ıllıllı

    That's a awesome idea! You could have so much fun trolling people with it! 

  • Reさ

    I also think the owner is the only one who may have permissions to do it, and you can already get a bot to say harmful things like make a custom command with it 

  • Sky_Dragonsz

    Reさ, if a bot says harmful things its fine, you can just ban the bot, but with the sudo command you will not know if it was the owner that forced someone else to say those things or if it was the user that said that. 


  • Mr.Mask

    it would be logged onto audit log Sky_dragonz
    i suggest this idea is great and say that noboy should every time downvote it

  • Sky_Dragonsz

    If it was something like this I wouldn't mind it as much

    But if it's something like this then this will be a huge problem, the other user doesn't know that you got sudo-ed. audit log is only accessible for admins of the server and you just ruined a friendship with an other person. 

    Also, the voting option is people expressing their opinion about this, you can't just say "Don't downvote this, its a great idea", the voting is here for a reason!


    TL;DR: I'm fine with the first picture, but if its something like the second one then I'm absolutely down voting this. 

  • Mr.Mask

    upvote it because the 1st one might be the one to be applied

  • DingleFlop

    This suggestion is just plain bad. There's no realistic use-case for this that doesn't relate to trolling.

  • Mr.Mask

    DingleFlop you are bad this is a ALT PROOF way to test the permisions PLUS you have no idea what you are talking about


  • Sky_Dragonsz

    Its funny that you suddenly feel attacked because people think this is a bad idea/suggestion. They don't mean you are bad, so why the name calling? 

    Testing permissions can easily be done with an alt account (yes, I know you are lazy to make an alt even with 10 minute mail) or even asking a friend (that you want to force to sudo) to test the permissions. 


    I feel like this idea originated from the sudo command you can use on minecraft (with plugins), but on minecraft it is fine to use it. You can't do much harm on minecraft.  

  • Mr.Mask

    you do know that 10minute mail dosent work on discord anymore it asks for phone number

  • thienbao860

    Have you ever thought about negative cause related to the suggestion you have? People here literally suggest you some harmfulness there, but you just keep trying to deny it. There are millions of people who are using Discord, and any type: good, bad, evil, childlish, etc. And I never think Discord will give a special feature random only to your ordinary guild. Don't just think about yourself; think about the others who got this feature and their complainment in the future

    Also, by you're saying: "Upvote this, don't downvote, etc.." is completely childlish. The voting system is for the expression the user given to the idea, not by the mean you will hunt down one by one you see them "hateful" to you because of the downvote. I hope you understand this. Also, I will not reply back whether you still want to hunt me or not. I'm just giving a downvote for this.

  • Scottieboy1794

    I would vote for a bot to sudo it’ll help with bots that can’t work without a person calling the command. As an example I would like for a bot I use to run a command for another bot with less work load but the other bot requires a person to run the command. I use Charlemagne for destiny 2 clan contributions and with the amount of people I rather one line instead of me doing everyone individually it’ll run the command by sudoing me when I tell it to. Plus make it owner only or admins based and then you don’t have to worry about other people trolling. It’s not that hard to keep others from trolling unless you want them too.

  • sparkzy

    this would be great


  • Mr.Mask

    There is so much hate

Du måste logga in om du vill lämna en kommentar.