Allow Admins to Override Being Blocked

評論

10 條評論

  • jedi3
    That sounds really dumb, if they have you blocked, you should not be able to force them to read your message. They have you blocked for a reason. If they choose not to read the message, that is their own fault.
    3
    評論操作 永久連結
  • waffles
    this would be a huge privacy issue and could very easily be abused
    1
    評論操作 永久連結
  • JukePlz

    ^ Mind explaining HOW this would be a privacy issue? This seems like a sane request on a per-server management basis, as long as it doesn't involve Direct Messages to the blocking user.

    1
    評論操作 永久連結
  • waffles
    I thought it was pretty straightforward but let me reiterate and hopefully you'll understand mister juke... An admin of a server is pestering you over DMs, you try to block them but you can't because of this sane implementation so this admin continues to spam your DMs, it sounds like an issue to me
    -1
    評論操作 永久連結
  • Thunder33345

    not privacy issue but more of a personal thing,

    if i explicitly blocked an admin there's a reason for that, and i do not want to see any messages from said admin

    there should be no way for that admin to overwrite my choice

    5
    評論操作 永久連結
  • Firefly

    Jesus Christ, -12 points, wasn't expecting that. I can see what you guys mean when it comes to abuse potential; I know that I'd try not to abuse it, and I'd hope that any server management worth their salt would crack down on misuse of the feature pretty hard, but I know that some people are just jackasses.

    Also, to clarify - I was envisioning a scenario where I could override the block only within the server in which I'm an admin. I get that there's still a huge potential for abuse though, so it seems this isn't really a worthwhile solution.

    0
    評論操作 永久連結
  • JukePlz

    ben™: I see you are missing the point, as I clarified in my first post this seems to be on a per-managed-server basis and "as long as it doesn't involve Direct Messages to the blocking user." (Firefly just clarified that)

    Thunder33345: The issue here is that users shouldn't have excuses to missbehave on private servers by muting admins. The same thing can currently be done with bots anyways and I don't see people abusing bots to override user settings. This is still a net gain because the cases of abuse from users is potentially much bigger than from admins. If a user has engaged in conflictive behaviour with server management and would still ignore server rule reminders regardless, this is in a point in conflict where they would be kicked anyways, and then proceed to ask for explanations from the admin team.

    -3
    評論操作 永久連結
  • chloroform chloe

    This is stupid. The block feature is a feature so users don't need to see or communicate with you at all. This isn't even an issue with Discord. If they won't drop the topic mute them, you did still say stop but they chose to block you it's not your fault they didn't see. This entire suggestion seems to be here because of a personal issue.

    4
    評論操作 永久連結
  • Thunder33345

    >but they chose to block you it's not your fault they didn't see. This entire suggestion seems to be here because of a personal issue.

    Totally this, that's on them not your fault if they didnt catch the memo(due to their own actions), they deserves the boot

    >If a user has engaged in conflictive behaviour with server management and would still ignore server rule reminders regardless, this is in a point in conflict where they would be kicked anyways, and then proceed to ask for explanations from the admin team.

    You as a moderator reserves the right to do anything*(TOS compliant) on your server with your own discretion, if they blocked mods, more than likely no amount of warnings will get the point cross, might as well just kick them out already

    3
    評論操作 永久連結
  • a lemon

    lets just not have this thing implemented and stop talking here.

    -2
    評論操作 永久連結

登入寫評論。